Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2004-05-09 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2004-05-09 Senate Journal Page 3542 HB 424 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 424(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 424(JUD) "An Act relating to review by the Legislative Affairs Agency of certain state agency regulations proposed for adoption, amendment, or repeal under the Administrative Procedure Act; repealing provisions relating to annulment of regulations; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 424(JUD) Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 11 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Ogan, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson Excused: Guess, Seekins Olson changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 424(JUD) passed the Senate. Senator Ben Stevens moved for the adoption of the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2004-05-09 Senate Journal Page 3543 CSHB 424(JUD) Effective Date Clause YEAS: 11 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Green, Ogan, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Hoffman, Lincoln, Olson Excused: Guess, Seekins and so, the effective date clause failed to be adopted. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 424(JUD)(efd fld S) was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.